Monday, 18 May 2015

Textual Analysis: The conjuring


Textual analysis: The Conjuring

The film I am analysing is ‘The Conjuring’, directed by James Wan, a successful film producer known for the unique content of his other creations such as saw and insidious. The film was released July 15th 2013. Also it shares the same subgenre genre of my 5minute A2 film supernatural/horror.

Narrative structure

The title slides slowly up the screen then goes into a p.o.v shot of a window with the car pulling up outside. The camera is slowly zooming in order to create a close up which could represent evil/ supernatural spirits lurking around the new home the family is about to move Into.  The camera Pans across two windows and stops at the front door then slowly zooms in revealing the new family moving into their home. We can state this as the equilibrium, as it is a state of normality and no ghastly occurrences has happened as of yet. The camera is slowly zooming into a close up of the family dog strongly resistant and scared to go into the new home. ‘The Family preparation’ moving all the furniture into the new house with non-diegetic 70’s music playing creates sense of normality.

The mother, father and 5 daughters are unpacking their belongings and beginning to turn their old fashioned and tarnished house into a home. The youngest daughter suggests a game of hide and seek with her other siblings, which results her hiding within a big hole in the basement. The dad is alerted by a terrified scream and so hurry’s to find his youngest daughter. When he retrieves her there is a reaction shot of his concerned face in which he is holding a flash torch looking at this cobwebbed hole that looks unappealing as if someone has carved this into the wall years beforehand. Non-diegetic echoing sinister music plays at a low volume in the background as all the family look at each other confused. However the mother calmly tells the father to patch the hole up. It is evident that the family takes this as they are overthinking the situation. This is the disruption of the equilibrium as things has shaken up the normality service. Also it has given the audience a clue that more unusual things will take place within their home as the storyline progresses.

Each time a new scene appears there is an establishing shot of the home isolated within the middle of nowhere emphasising to the audience that there is ‘no escape’. This is a typical feature of the genre as many supernatural/horror films wants to make the audience feels discomfort as we know a vulnerable family will be targeted. There is a long shot of the mother peering out of their window then the camera pans down onto their front garden revealing a dead pigeon. A close up of her face is revealed in order to show her bewilderedness of how the bird happened to die. Soon after the camera whip pans towards the daughter entering the mother’s room which gave her a slight shock. She is stating that is was cold in her bedroom at night even with the heating on. The camera whip pans to the other daughter coming out of her room stating that her room had a funny smell. The mother makes excuses for their concerns but when they enter back into t their rooms there is a close up of her face scanning down on her arms as she can see an unknown bruise on her arm. Judging by her facial expressions she looks paranoid but is confused as to how this occurred. This can be established at the recognition of disruption because there are several clues revealing that something is not at a normality stare within their home.

 The narrative is restricted as we find out the stages leading up the disruption the same time as the characters do. However the clues leading up to the disruption of the film such as the repetition of the mother waking up with unknown bruises, the children complaining about the room being cold, funny smells in the room every night, the daughter continuously sleep walking into the wardrobe and the dog resistant to enter the home. Showing the equilibrium structure is clearly structured in order to raise the audience’s attention and empathise with the characters.  Due to research it is apparent that these are all signs of a ghostly figure lurking within a home.

There is a close up of one of the daughters sleeping with the camera slowly zooming out making it a medium shot of her sleeping in bed. The zooming out could represent the ghosts p.o.v. spying on the girl. High key low contrast lighting is used as it is night time and makes it more of a tense atmosphere. A long shot is slowly panning down on the bottom of the bed building of the tension as the audience doesn’t know what will happen. An eye level shot is used to show the little sister’s leg being rapidly pulled by an evil spirit. However we cannot see this spirit but suspect this. There is a p.o.v shot showing her looking under the bed which pans left to right. This is effective as it makes the audience sympathise with the character and become scared for her. In addition there is an arc shot when she rises up from looking under the bed. This could represent her feeling of the moment which is mixed emotions and physically sick knowing that something is not right within her room. Her frightened facial expressions define that she is disturbed by what she is seeing. The audience still cannot see what she is seeing. This is what makes the scene effective because it is tension building and what you what expect to see within a supernatural genre. This is typical of the genre as evil spirits or ghastly occurrences happen to the most vulnerable. As she is the youngest daughter the ghost sees this as an advantage to raise the attention of the elders.

The conjuring is in chronological order. Except from when they use a short flashback at the beginning in order for the audience to define what the ghost hunters do and how good they are at their profession. It is effective that it is in chronological order as it makes it more tension building for the audience to find out the source of the problem towards the end which is very common is supernatural genres. Also considering that it is based on a true story doing it in chronological order would be more effective. 

 

 

Binary oppositions

The Conjuring explores several binary oppositions such as ‘good Vs evil’. This is because evil occurrences are happening to good people such as the evil spirits trying to sabotage the family’s lives. As the audience, we give our allegiance and sympathy to the targeted family. And label the evilness as the evil spirits. Binary oppositions was introduced by Levi Strauss in 1959 he believed there was a certain concept of how the audience view a film. He argued that the “savage” mind has the same structures as the “civilised” mind.  For example the typical convention of a superhero movie there will be “hero vs villain”. Embedding these ingredients within a film makes it easier for the audience to relate to a character and also allows for the equilibrium structure to be clearly identified.

 ‘Superiority vs inferiority ’. In the film the males are not the vulnerable targets which explores how the conventions of the genre is for a mainstream audience and will not however this is highlighting the conventions of a supernatural genre as the female character is invariably the vulnerable target in most films of this genre.

 

Genre conventions

The supernatural horror genre contains gruesome, demons and ghosts lurking within an isolated setting targeting innocent people, it also contains elements within the film related to religion. The family is Christians and so they keep religious ornaments such as crucifixes and pictures of god around their home. This is an effective convention of the genre as we can base the narrative around they are being targeted by evil spirits and heavily have strong beliefs in this.  

The film is typical of the supernatural genre as the setting is an abandoned house in the middle of nowhere. This creates the feeling of isolation and “no escape” which increases tension because help cannot be called instantly. Also a family with the majority being female (6 daughters, mother and father). This makes it typical of the genre as horror movies target females as they portray them to be the more vulnerable and the fearful character.

The title is in simple bold time’s new roman font with a black background and yellow writing. Yellow normally connotates happiness and sunshine. However it could also connotate madness and physical illness. This could be representing the unusual and peculiar circumstances in which the family go through. Moreover the black represents the mystery, gloom and evilness happening within the family’s home, but the yellow could represent the family’s strong bond and happiness never the less. The combination of these two colours correlate well as it explores the binary oppositions of ‘good and evil’. 

Overall the story begins with minor clues in order to build up the tension, it also has many conventions of a supernatural genre such as the jump scares and non-diegetic orchestral music. They also show close ups of ghosts faces for jump scares for the audience. The way the family are positioned within the frame show they are less superior within this situation as the ghostly spirits lurking in their home has more power over them. Moreover when the ghost hunters, a husband and wife, come over to help the family out the way how they are positioned in the frame is powerful, professional and superior to the ghosts as they are a threat. By their fearless facial expressions and confident body language. There are several close ups of the ghost hunters stern faces implying to the audience they are serious about their profession.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Monday, 20 April 2015

Conjuring review analysis


The Conjuring (15)
Verdict: Genuinely creepy
Rating: 4 Star Rating
Can a haunted house still be frightening? This surprise American hit of the summer, which out-grossed every blockbuster it was up against, delivers spectacular reassurance that it can.
Among the most efficient horror films of the past two years was Insidious, by Australian director James Wan. 
Previously, he made Saw — a better-crafted movie than its many sequels, and much classier than the flood of torture porn it regrettably inspired. 
Now he’s turned his back on out-and-out violence, and applied his talents to a ghost story that really happened.
Director James Wan delivers guts and gore in Saw. Here, he crafts a much classier ghost story based on real-life events that brings claustrophobia, fear and panic to the screen
Director James Wan delivers guts and gore in Saw. Here, he crafts a much classier ghost story based on real-life events that brings claustrophobia, fear and panic to the screen
The Conjuring records how real-life paranormal investigators and devout Catholics Ed and Lorraine Warren (played for maximum realism, squareness and humourlessness by Patrick Wilson and Vera Farmiga) were summoned to investigate a demonic presence in a family house in Harrisville, Rhode Island.
This was occupied by laid-back non-believers Carolyn and Roger Perron (Ron Livingston and Lili Taylor) and their five daughters. It was nearly occupied by their dog, but the mutt refused to go in.
Birds started flying into the house and breaking their necks. All the clocks stopped at 3.07am. Then there were the noises . . .
Horror fans may already recognise the names of the Warrens. 
Later in their careers, they investigated horrific happenings in a place called Amityville, events which gave rise to several highly fictionalised motion pictures, sequels and remakes.
Unusually, screenwriters Chad and Carey W. Hayes choose to tell this earlier story from two quite different viewpoints: the Warrens’ and the Perrons’.
 
This slightly diminishes the intensity of haunted house movies — claustrophobia, fear and finally panic — but hugely adds to the sense of documentary realism and lack of contrivance.
Fine acting also helps. We haven’t seen enough of Vera Farmiga since her Oscar-nominated performance in Up In The Air. 
She brings a barely controlled anxiety to the proceedings that reminded me pleasurably of Nicole Kidman in The Others and the Spanish actress Belen Rueda’s remarkable performance in the outstanding haunted house film of recent years, The Orphanage.
Lili Taylor is another remarkable but under-used acting talent. She has the ability to run the gamut of emotions from happy housewife to . . . well, I won’t spoil it for you. 
The sequence where she hunts for her youngest daughter in an ill-advised blindfold game of hide-and-seek is a classic.
The film-makers make no attempt to explain precisely how ghosts operate or, indeed, any other mysteries surrounding the afterlife.
Lili Taylor (pictured) and Vera Farmiga are under-used but remarkable actresses who shine in this spooky setting
Lili Taylor (pictured) and Vera Farmiga are under-used but remarkable actresses who shine in this spooky setting
This may sound like a cop-out, but within the picture it adds to the sense that the characters are discovering more as they go along — and may never know the whole truth. 
Will The Conjuring revolutionise horror films? No. Does it deliver violence and gore? Not by modern horror standards.
But it is scary, and it conveys something even rarer in horror films — the ring of truth.
There will be those who dismiss The Conjuring as the kind of hokum they’ve seen many times before.
Liberties with the truth have been taken to compress the events of a year into just under two hours.
I am interested that in real life the daughters were keener to stay in the house than their parents, and the youngest felt a real connection to the ghostly son of the family who built the house. 
Many of the spirits were (according to the children who recorded their experiences) benign, and it was the mother who was terrorised by a spirit who regarded her as a threat. If more of that detail had been left in, the story might have felt more original and less generic.
But Wan has clearly watched such masterpieces as Jack Clayton’s The Innocents. 
He knows that creaking doors, spooky cellars and the feeling that there may be something hiding in that old wardrobe are tried-and-tested ingredients.
Given the right director — one who knows the value of long, suspenseful tracking shots and leaving parts of the frame suggestively in shadow — these films still have the power to unsettle and terrify.
I promise you one thing. Watch this and you’ll always think twice about playing hide and seek. And you’ll never, ever use a blindfold.


 

 
The laidback tone of the text and less complex vocabulary implies that it is aimed at the ‘general reader’, conjointly a primary target audience (15-25), will take more of an interest to read a review like this as it is more to the point and does not give background success and information on the director.
 However this does not say that a mature audience will not read this. This house style is highly common as the text is still formal but to more of an extent conversational.  For example “watch this and you’ll think twice about playing hide and seek”. This is emotive to the readers and makes them feel enticed within reading. Also the rhetorical questions make the reader feel more to an extent involved.
The large imagery is the central attraction as it shows key action scenes within the film. The younger audience will be drawn into reading the review because of this.
This review could be aimed at people with a socio economic grade of d and below (working class) because of the less detailed and ordinary writing style of the review.  The writer, David Tookey also focuses on the cinematography used such as the tracking shots and how it was effective in making the scenes build up tension as well as suspense. He also sheds light on the fact that the storyline is original and felt less generic. This is important for a reader to acknowledge as they will be interested in watching a supernatural genre film that is unique from the rest.
The conversational tone causes the readers to feel more at ease and decide for themselves if they will view the film or not. There is also reference of the actor’s names but he does not go into detail about their acting ability’s, this could suggest he does not see this as a key theme to mention.
 

 
 
 
 
Reference:  http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2382739/The-Conjuring-review-Watch-youll-play-hide-seek-again.html Writer of review: Chris Tookey  (Published: December 13 2013)